ON HARD FACTS OF MICHAEL´S INNOCENCE
I received a comment which said that Evan Chandler seemed
genuine in his belief that the relationship was negatively affecting
Jordan. We weren´t there, can´t say definitively
what happened and it could be possible that Michael did do it.
Yes, some people need only hard facts to be sure of what happened
(or not happened) between Jordan Chandler and Michael Jackson.
Okay, here is a hard fact which asserts Michael´s complete
innocence JORDAN DESCRIBED MICHAEL AS CIRCUMCISED WHILE
IN REALITY HE WAS NOT. For the accuser whose father is Jewish
and who is probably circumcised himself this crucial and glaring
mistake settles the matter once and for all Michael was
INNOCENT and the things told about him were complete SLANDER.
I wish I didn´t have to elaborate on details of that,
but the presence of foreskin can more or less go unnoticed in
case of an intercourse (sorry I had to say that) which was never
alleged by anyone at all, but in case of masturbation which
was the essence of that allegation (sorry again) the foreskin
is the very first thing to notice. It simply cannot
go unnoticed as it is not only the visual picture which
is different, but the feel of it is different too as the foreskin
moves in the process even when erect (OMG, sorry again). So
if Jordan made a crucial mistake in a matter like that there
can be no doubt that he was telling a LIE.
When making general descriptions of the ´abuse´
the Chandlers could tell whatever their fantasies or internet
testimonies of real victims prompted them, but when it came
to the basic fact which could be either this or that they had
to make a guess and their guess was WRONG, even though
the statistics for the US is that 90% of all men are circumcised.
In the 1970s the circumcision rate was 94%, 91% and 57% in Whites,
Blacks and Hispanics, respectively see information and
pictures on the matter here: What
Never mind who says what now we can make a full stop
here, close the subject forever and admit that all of us OWE
A REALLY BIG APOLOGY TO MICHAEL.
ON EVAN CHANDLER´S GUILT
After stating this hard fact of Michael´s innocence there
is actually no need to look into what doubters further say about
this and that whether Pellicano was a bad guy or not,
or whether Evan genuinely believed any abuse was taking place
or just pretended it did. Yes, the tape of his talk with David
Schwartz shows that he seemed to believe in what he was saying
and was entangled in most terrible emotions, but what does
Nothing. It only shows that his motives could have been slightly
different from what we initially thought them to be not
just an impassive and calculating extortion in its rudest and
blatant form, but the extortion colored by severe emotions which
led him to the nastiest form of revenge any man could think
of first a media massacre and ruining Michael´s
health (and ultimately his life), then taking $15 mln. and making
an agreement, only to immediately break it by letting his brother
write a book where both of them gave full vein to their wildest
imagination despite the agreement Evan had just signed.
Yes, the book All that glitters by Ray Chandler
is an especially disgusting form of the family´s twisted
behavior and betrayal of all possible decency Evan Chandler
chose to take the money and then stab Michael in the back by
telling hideous stories about him (and his own son!) instead
of going to court and telling his story there. If he really
thought Michael was to blame wasn´t it his moral obligation
to his son and the society in general to stop the molester
and testify in court especially since both he and Jordan
had every chance to do it twice, both in 1993 and in 2005?
Why didn´t Evan go to court, let´s say in 2005?
Because he WAS NOT SURE OF HIS SUSPICIONS, that´s why.
And why did he provide all the information to his brother to
publish a book then? A kind answer would be because he was eager
to EXPLAN HIMSELF to the general public. Playing the devil´s
advocate I´ll say that his desire not to look a villain
or an extortionist in the eyes of the public is more or less
understandable but the only decent way of dealing with that
problem was by speaking up in court
. Instead he preferred
to kill two birds with one stone take the money and whitewash
himself in his book of betrayal by saying to everyone around
see what grounds I had for behaving the way I did
Please note that I´m not dwelling on the financial gain
from such a project at all.
Below is a great piece from YouTube providing proof that the
Chandlers planned a book of their fantasies IMMEDIATELY UPON
AGREEING NOT TO RUIN MICHAEL´S REPUTATION ANY FURTHER
and this while the ink was not yet dry under their agreement.
Here it is:
Wasn´t it the same Evan Chandler who later demanded $60
mln. from Michael for his feeble attempts to say at least something
in his defense? And who thundered in indignation over Michael´s
alleged breaking the agreement by merely saying he was innocent
in his and Lisa-Maria´s interview with Diane Sawyer?
Or by asserting his innocence in his heart-wrenching songs of
the History album?
ON EVAN CHANDLER´S SUICIDE
Since both the accuser and accused are deceased now I really don´t
want to pass judgment on Evan Chandler. HIS SUICIDE AS WELL AS
ITS TIMING ACTUALLY TELLS IT ALL.
No one will ever convince me that he committed suicide due to
his pains only his money could have bought him all the
painkillers in the world. What looks more probable to me is that
while Michael was alive Evan Chandler felt he still had a theoretical
possibility to make amends for all the wrongs done to the man.
But with Michael suddenly gone this chance was lost and this could
have made things unbearable for Evan, especially since he knew
that Michael´s ruined life was ultimately his doing.
Why rule out a possibility of him having some remorse?
Why not give Evan the benefit of this decent doubt?
After all Judah couldn´t live either with all that burden
on his conscience even despite the 30 silvers and a field he had
bought for the money?
I hear that Ray Chandler didn´t attend his brother´s
funeral. So he wasn´t at one with his deceased brother any
longer? Another small point in favor of my supposition
P.S. A short note on the power of Evan Chandler´s emotions:
In 2006, Jordan Chandler sued his father for life threatening
physical abuse. According to court documents filed in New Jersey:
The judge found that plaintiff had proved that he and his
father, the defendant, were members of the same household when
defendant struck him on the head from behind with a twelve and
one-half pound weight and then sprayed his eyes with mace or pepper
spray and tried to choke him. The judge also found that the weight
could cause serious bodily injury or death.
Link to information on case: Click
Thank you Helena for your generosity
sharing your investigation!