Michael Jackson´s Innocence and Evan Chandler´s Guilt & Suicide

  by Helena on vindicatemj.wordpress.com


I received a comment which said that “Evan Chandler seemed genuine in his belief that the relationship was negatively affecting Jordan. We weren´t there, can´t say definitively what happened and it could be possible that Michael did do it”.

Yes, some people need only hard facts to be sure of what happened (or not happened) between Jordan Chandler and Michael Jackson. Okay, here is a hard fact which asserts Michael´s complete innocence — JORDAN DESCRIBED MICHAEL AS CIRCUMCISED WHILE IN REALITY HE WAS NOT. For the accuser whose father is Jewish and who is probably circumcised himself this crucial and glaring mistake settles the matter once and for all — Michael was INNOCENT and the things told about him were complete SLANDER.

I wish I didn´t have to elaborate on details of that, but the presence of foreskin can more or less go unnoticed in case of an intercourse (sorry I had to say that) which was never alleged by anyone at all, but in case of masturbation which was the essence of that allegation (sorry again) the foreskin is the very first thing to notice. It simply cannot go unnoticed as it is not only the visual picture which is different, but the feel of it is different too as the foreskin moves in the process even when erect (OMG, sorry again). So if Jordan made a crucial mistake in a matter like that there can be no doubt that he was telling a LIE.

When making general descriptions of the ´abuse´ the Chandlers could tell whatever their fantasies or internet testimonies of real victims prompted them, but when it came to the basic fact which could be either this or that they had to make a guess — and their guess was WRONG, even though the statistics for the US is that 90% of all men are circumcised. In the 1970s the circumcision rate was 94%, 91% and 57% in Whites, Blacks and Hispanics, respectively — see information and pictures on the matter here: What is Circumcision?

Never mind who says what now — we can make a full stop here, close the subject forever and admit that all of us OWE A REALLY BIG APOLOGY TO MICHAEL.


After stating this hard fact of Michael´s innocence there is actually no need to look into what doubters further say about this and that “ whether Pellicano was a bad guy or not, or whether Evan genuinely believed any abuse was taking place or just pretended it did. Yes, the tape of his talk with David Schwartz shows that he seemed to believe in what he was saying and was entangled in most terrible emotions, but what does it change?

Nothing. It only shows that his motives could have been slightly different from what we initially thought them to be — not just an impassive and calculating extortion in its rudest and blatant form, but the extortion colored by severe emotions which led him to the nastiest form of revenge any man could think of — first a media massacre and ruining Michael´s health (and ultimately his life), then taking $15 mln. and making an agreement, only to immediately break it by letting his brother write a book where both of them gave full vein to their wildest imagination — despite the agreement Evan had just signed.

Yes, the book “All that glitters” by Ray Chandler is an especially disgusting form of the family´s twisted behavior and betrayal of all possible decency — Evan Chandler chose to take the money and then stab Michael in the back by telling hideous stories about him (and his own son!) instead of going to court and telling his story there. If he really thought Michael was to blame wasn´t it his moral obligation to his son and the society in general to stop the “molester” and testify in court — especially since both he and Jordan had every chance to do it twice, both in 1993 and in 2005?

Why didn´t Evan go to court, let´s say in 2005? Because he WAS NOT SURE OF HIS SUSPICIONS, that´s why. And why did he provide all the information to his brother to publish a book then? A kind answer would be because he was eager to EXPLAN HIMSELF to the general public. Playing the devil´s advocate I´ll say that his desire not to look a villain or an extortionist in the eyes of the public is more or less understandable but the only decent way of dealing with that problem was by speaking up in court…. Instead he preferred to kill two birds with one stone — take the money and whitewash himself in his book of betrayal by saying to everyone around “see what grounds I had for behaving the way I did”

Please note that I´m not dwelling on the financial gain from such a project at all.

Below is a great piece from YouTube providing proof that the Chandlers planned a book of their fantasies IMMEDIATELY UPON AGREEING NOT TO RUIN MICHAEL´S REPUTATION ANY FURTHER — and this while the ink was not yet dry under their agreement. Here it is:

Wasn´t it the same Evan Chandler who later demanded $60 mln. from Michael for his feeble attempts to say at least something in his defense? And who thundered in indignation over Michael´s alleged breaking the agreement by merely saying he was innocent — in his and Lisa-Maria´s interview with Diane Sawyer? Or by asserting his innocence in his heart-wrenching songs of the History album?


Since both the accuser and accused are deceased now I really don´t want to pass judgment on Evan Chandler. HIS SUICIDE AS WELL AS ITS TIMING ACTUALLY TELLS IT ALL.

No one will ever convince me that he committed suicide due to his pains only — his money could have bought him all the painkillers in the world. What looks more probable to me is that while Michael was alive Evan Chandler felt he still had a theoretical possibility to make amends for all the wrongs done to the man. But with Michael suddenly gone this chance was lost and this could have made things unbearable for Evan, especially since he knew that Michael´s ruined life was ultimately his doing.

Why rule out a possibility of him having some remorse?
Why not give Evan the benefit of this decent doubt?
After all Judah couldn´t live either with all that burden on his conscience even despite the 30 silvers and a field he had bought for the money?

I hear that Ray Chandler didn´t attend his brother´s funeral. So he wasn´t at one with his deceased brother any longer? Another small point in favor of my supposition…

P.S. A short note on the power of Evan Chandler´s emotions:

In 2006, Jordan Chandler sued his father for life threatening physical abuse. According to court documents filed in New Jersey: “The judge found that plaintiff had proved that he and his father, the defendant, were members of the same household when defendant struck him on the head from behind with a twelve and one-half pound weight and then sprayed his eyes with mace or pepper spray and tried to choke him. The judge also found that the weight could cause serious bodily injury or death”.

Link to information on case: Click here

Thank you Helena for your generosity sharing your investigation!