Another article from the Floacist on whether
any HUSH money was paid to the Chandlers: The Chandlers
were not prohibited from testifying against Jackson in
a criminal trial, as long as they notified Jackson´s attorneys
beforehand. Contrary to popular belief, the settlement did NOT
silence anybody. It was the family´s own decision not
to testify in the criminal case; they could have gotten
money and justice but they only opted to take the money.
Ask yourself this: if your child was molested, would you not
do everything in your power to put the person responsible behind
bars? The Chandlers did not. Instead, they dropped the
claims of child abuse against Jackson, signed a document where
he basically called them liars, took his money and refused to
talk to authorities. I have already pointed out the numerous
reasons why Jackson settled the case; what reason did the
Chandlers have to not testify?
For the past ten years, the media have been referring to the
settlement as a pay off but here is my question:
what exactly did Michael Jackson buy when he settled
the civil lawsuit?
How can anyone call it hush money when it did
not prevent the accuser from testifying against him? How
can anyone call it hush money when the entire
world already knew about the allegations? How can anyone
call it hush money when there was still an ongoing
criminal investigation that was not affected by the civil suit?
Thank you Helena for your generosity
sharing your investigation!