July 12th, 2010
Guys, let me share some views with you on what we have here
under the name of Desiree. 1) First let me tell you one thing
- I truly marvel at your patience ( I always thought
that Michaels fans were the best).
The person youve been battling for hours and even days
is a dedicated HATER of Michael Jackson and the point about
liking Michael for his music is a complete LIE. When you
hate somebody that much you cannot like the music either (same
as it is impossible for me to like Marilyn Manson though his
music may be interesting). A persons creation is inseparable
from his personality especially in such a dramatic case
like Michael Jacksons.
Why this hater poses as a fan here I dont know
probably to give a message to the world that a new rise in Michaels
popularity (records, documentary film, etc.) does not mean that
the public is reconsidering their attitude to him as a human
being, so that you may be a fan and still hate.
However this is only one reason out of a thousand possible.
2) Our hater says in her blog that she is a 20 years smth
black student majoring in microbiology. She/he
does produce the impression of a mature and educated person
who even goes as far as referring to Machiavelli. As far as
I know Machiavelli was a politician who was known for his ultimate
cynicism (among other things he justified wars by the need to
control birth rate).
Please correct me if I am wrong since when have educated
people with a scholarly mind started reading the Mirror?
I remember the first time I mentioned the Mirror
as a source of information to some English people, they made
me feel somewhat ashamed by laughing We dont read
papers like that. And these were not scholars these
But that was long ago though has
it changed since then? Is the Mirror considered now a reputable
source of information?
3) Okay, so when it comes to Michael Jackson our intellectual
Desiree is no longer choosy and is ready to believe every word
of what the Mirror says (it does happen with some haters
anything is good for them as long as it feeds their hatred).
I checked up the story she/he referred to about that
drug which restricts the sex-drive allegedly given to Michael
to suppress his desire for young boys. The story
lived for 3 days (August 8-10, 2009) and was reported by numerous
media outlets all of which pointed at the Mirror
as the source of their information.
I do not intend to advertise this article now so here is the
gist of it 0nly (the most decent of the Mirrors comments
were selected for the summary with the main facts preserved):
Some source reveals information about Jacko (yes, they use
the name even after the mans death!) that he received
a certain drug to suppress his sexual urge. The drug restricts
mens flow of testosterone-producing brain hormones
Now if this drug was indeed given to Michael
and if Michael knew what he was given and if all this
is not a complete fabrication the drug could be very
well used for suppressing Michaels normal heterosexual
sex-urge which was probably rather powerful if some women noticed
his erection during the concert (see Tevas surprising
remark to the Welcome to the haters site post ).
If Michael was sexually very potent this could have been
an issue with him especially in a concert with so many
screaming girls around him and this does not necessarily
have anything to do with boys. The drug is used for a forceful
decrease of sex urge in all men who have a history of sexual
assaults (raping women, etc.). It is a sort of a chemical castration
and considering the danger of it . I really wonder if
any male would agree to this procedure of his own free will.
Even if the effect is reversible being potent is a sensitive
issue for ALL men, so if some doctor did want to do this to
a male I strongly suspect the man wouldnt fall for the
unless the doctor forced him to
didnt tell him what he was doing
Please remember that all this mental equilibrium is okay only
in case all those ifs we began with are true
which I now doubt more than ever
The Mirror goes on with the story: Jacko
first met the doctor in 2001 when he sought treatment for a
broken foot after slipping on stairs at his Neverland ranch.
Well, Dr. Farshchian is a specialist treating arthritis and
problems with bones, so he could deal with
Michaels broken foot as well as his back pain which he
also suffered from.
But unlike other medics who Jacko
latched on to, Dr Farshchian, 47, refused to pander to his demands
for non-stop prescriptions
. Now this statement
is highly disputable the TMZ cites a letter attributed
to Dr. Farshcian in which he recommends to his patient a powerful
narcotic painkiller: Buprinex is the potent narcotic
I told you about last week. It is just like the D but better.
I have everything ready. Its a 5-7 day program
that offers you the solution . The solution to treat
Michaels pain or replace Demerol with? Both variants are
possible, while there is no hint at suppressing any sex-urge,
as you may have noticed.
He tried to wean Jacko off Demerol,
the narcotic painkiller widely linked to his death six weeks
ago. Let me correct the newspaper again. Firstly,
DEMEROL WAS NOT FOUND in Michael Jacksons system so it
seems that Michael managed to beat this habit after all, and
secondly, he died of a different medicine PROPOFOL and
if the newspaper does not know it, so much the worse
Let us sum up. Now that we are almost through
with the article what evidence have we collected on that sex-drug
issue? Only what youve seen above. And who provided this
wealth of information? As usual some unnamed spokesman
: Asked if Dr Farshchians
had prescribed drugs to Jacko to curb his sex drive, his spokesman
confirmed: Yes, thats exactly it. He was trying
to help Michael. The other source is Ian Barkley
who is said by the Sunday Mirror to be Jackos
official photographer between 2002-06. He allegedly
claimed that Dr Farshchian
was trying to help Michael. One treatment and concoction led
to another (as is usual in any treatment).
It was a slow progression to try to help Michael suppress some
of his issues. (which ones?)
And at another point the Mirror hints: Of
Jackos sleepovers, where children drank Jesus Juice
wine from cola cans, the photographer said: People in
Michaels circle thought that something inappropriate was
going on when theyd all sleep together at Neverland Ranch
Let us double check these hints with what the CBS news reported
on June 2, 2004. The article also refers to Ian Barkley,
Jacksons photographer, adding that he worked for Michael
Jackson for most of 2003 (and not for four years between 2002-2006
as the Mirror says). It quotes Ian Barkley saying about the
Barkley insists Jackson never harmed
the teen, and says the Brazil trip was simply a shrewd business
decision. The goal was to draw attention away from the post-documentary
scandal and refocus the spotlight on Jacksons forthcoming
album launch. Theres no way anyone would try
to hold them against their will. Theres no way Michael
would allow it, says Barkley, who worked with Jackson
for most of 2003, and still has close relationships with both
Schaffel and Wiesner.
There was no conspiracy to abduct, Barkley says.
I think the intent of the Brazil trip was actually to
distance Michael from the family, temporarily, just so that
the relationships were a little bit separated. The family was,
from what I understand, they were actually enthused about going
4) I would have surely been able to find more facts to disprove
the Mirror article if I had more time and desire to do it. But
if every particle of Desirees hatred for Michael
Jackson is to be checked in the same way there will be nothing
else for us to do here but struggle with her hate.
Of course if any of us have spare time for a thrilling discussion
like that we can naturally involve ourselves in it. But I
see this forceful involvement of Michaels fans in the
issues they would like us to discuss as an intentional
move on the part of Michaels haters. They
want to entangle us in a non-stop discussion of their allegations,
they want to shower us with their lies and expect us to incessantly
refute them, and since there will be no end to these lies
it means that we will never have time for anything else but
being busy with these guys.
Therefore I have the following suggestion to Michaels
supporters let us make a note of haters ideas but
let us not remonstrate with them and try to talk them into changing
their views. It is impossible to bring the desirees
over to our side they are professional haters
who are exactly the ones who use the Machiavellian and Svengali
methods they are referring to above.
5) Since it is not us, but them who are obsessed,
I am very much afraid that Michaels supporters should
prepare themselves for new assaults from haters. It is clear
now that this adventure of ours is not going to be plain sailing
same as they didnt leave Michael alone they wont
leave us alone either there will be haters masquerading
as fans, new blogs and sites set up in fans names, real
Michaels fans fooled by fake ones and taken away from
Michaels mainstream, haters publishing secret mjj files
and discovering new witnesses, so on and so forth
It seems we should really steel yourselves for a long and difficult
Should we fight them? I dont think so. Let us leave the
haters alone with their hatred and let us never allow ourselves
to use the lie and hate weapons they are employing. Let us move
on to clear the environment of the lies they are polluting it
with and search for the truth instead.
And let those who will choose between us decide for themselves.
P.S. Desiree, it wasnt lost on me that your email starts
with the words jesusjuice. So much for your love
Thank you Helena for your generosity
sharing your investigation!