I knew that Michael Jackson was innocent when
I saw him picking up a kid at a concert with such a reverence
and worship with which my people come up to icons only.
There is no word to describe the happiness his eyes were beaming
with it was as if he were carrying someone sacred in
his arms or he was the one who received a holy touch
A man like that is simply incapable of doing anything
bad and we all know it. However our knowledge of Michael´s
innocence comes from a heart-to-heart relationship with
Michael which isn´t asking for any proof whatsoever.
This is not the same with those who were brainwashed by the
media and do not have a spark of Michael´s fire in their
soul yet. These people need facts only and it is our
job to provide and overwhelm them with these facts.
Some will say that our opponents are beyond hope? I wouldn´t
be so sure of that look at Aphrodite Jones who had been
among Michael´s haters until after she looked into the
evidence (or rather its absence) which made her realize how
terribly wrong she had been before.
Contrary to what some of Michael´s fans say I think we
should openly face our opponents hardcore haters
won´t be shattered of course, but those who are still
in doubt may be. I think that haters shouldn´t be remonstrated
with instead they should be laughed at and shown that
they are desperately behind times in their blind and inexplicable
hatred for Michael.
In fact they KNOW that they´ve been inventing lies about
him for decades and it enrages them to see the world awakening
to the truth now. They feel they might finally lose the battle
and this is what makes them grit their teeth in the fear of
an imminent crash. Turn them into a laughing stock and that
would be the end of them
Let us be calm and composed in vindicating Michael. We have
nothing to fear. We KNOW that Michael was innocent. We may be
only missing some information at the moment but that´s
It gives me immense joy and relief to see that hostile articles
are now being followed by a long trail of replies which are
90% positive about Michael. Unlike his haters the people standing
up for Jackson have consciensciously done their research and
know what they are talking about.
Here is just another piece of valuable information for us to
store in the database of Michael´s innocence and media
AttorneysRule wrote on 27 Oct 2009 in his reply to a
filthy article by the Guardian´s (!) Tanya Gold:
I realize that you tried to write an article that would get
attention by being read and criticized by Michaels legions of
fans. However, the next time you write an article, please try
to get the facts correct. That way, it will be uniformly ignored.
As an attorney, and one who has read all of the trial transcripts
and evidence meticulously collected by Tom Sneddon, I am of
the opinion that Michael Jackson was a victim of prosecutorial
misconduct. I don´t expect you to do the same level of
research, but at least get the basic facts correct.
Jordie Chandler DID NOT accurately describe Michael Jackson´s
genitalia. He gave a description through a sworn affidavit in
which he attested that Michael Jackson was circumcised. Dr.
Strick, retained on behalf of the sheriff´s department,
confirmed that Michael Jackson was NOT circumcised.
Also, while the prosecutor´s office released a statement
that doctors indicated that there was a strong similarity between
the description and the body search, Dr. Strick recently told
Geraldo Rivera that he was TOLD that it was a match.
If Dr. Strick did not make the determination of a match, who
did? You? Diane Dimond? Tom Sneddon?
Research that issue, hopefully, given the head start I´ve
given you, you´ll get it right.
Thank you Helena for your generosity
sharing your investigation!