He was NOT circumcised



  by Helena on vindicatemj.wordpress.com



Why would Jordan Chandler repeatedly refuse to testify in court — both in 1993 and 2005? Why would he change his whereabouts THREE times since the 2005 case began and avoid speaking before the jury at all costs?

The reason why Jordan´s evidence could not have stood ground in court was that there was one MAJOR contradiction between his testimony and the actual fact. This major inconsistency was found during Michael´s 25-minute strip search which proved Jordan had been wrong in his description of Michael´s genitalia.

According to John Randy Taraborrelli “All eyes peered at him to see if he was circumcised, as Jordy had claimed. HE WASN´T.”

The story told in newspapers at the time makes your hair stand on end at the horror and humiliation Michael had to go through. The prosecutors made Michael quit the rehabilitation course in the UK (thus bringing the result of his anti—drug therapy to a nil) and summoned him back to the country. And though the media gossiped on Michael´s “hiding away from justice” he proved all the sceptics wrong by returning home on December 10, 1993.

The strip search was held just before Christmas (on December 20, 1993) and was so horrifying a procedure that reading about it is quite an ordeal in itself. I wonder how he could have survived it all…

And how could anyone ever believe such an outrageous lie? There has NEVER any evidence to substantiate Jordan Chandler´s claim. The fact alone that no charges were ever brought against Michael Jackson indicates that the description did NOT match. A member of the grand jury in 1994 even told CNN that “NO damaging evidence was heard.”

On January 27, 1994 (the next day the settlement with the Chandlers was made public) the news about the result of the strip search was finally reported in the press. Reuters News Service said that the accuser´s description given to the police was NOT ACCURATE: “photos of Michael Jackson´s genitalia do not match descriptions given by the boy who accused the singer of sexual misconduct.”

This information however received little coverage in the media whereas months before they had been trashing Michael. In fact everyone was so thrilled by the news of the financial settlement with the ´victim´ that no one really noticed that there was actually NOTHING TO PAY FOR.

Thank you Helena for your generosity sharing your investigation!