September 04, 2010
To Victor Gutierrez I just have one question:
Whose Diary was it again? I dont need to make any comments
in this article it speaks for itself.
TV show continues to prick Michael Jacksons credibility
Article from:New York Amsterdam News
Article date: May 21, 1994 Author:
New York Amsterdam News
TV show continues to prick Michael Jacksons credibility.
Tabloid TV show Hard Copy continues its leading
role in the persecution of Michael Jackson with a so-called
diary written by the father of the 14-year-old boy who was allegedly
sexually abused by Jackson.
The diary, which was admittedly procured by Hard Copy,
was read on the air Monday and Tuesday May 9 and 10, in typical
Hard Copy fashion.
The diary tells the fathers version of the events surrounding
the abuse case, but despite Hard Copys attempt
to put its own suspicious spin on the information, it also reveals
the fathers greed and manipulation of the situation for
his own benefit.
The father, according to the diary, asked his son had Michael
ever touched him. The boy hesitated and told his
father he did not want to hurt Michael and asked his father
to promise not to tell anyone. The father agreed. The boy then
said that yes, Michael had touched him. With this information
he approached Jackson via Anthony Pellicano, Jacksons
then security chief and, according to the father, a deal was
suggested that would help his son. He told his own
lawyer that the deal, which involved $20 million, should be
negotiated but, if it fell through, to begin legal proceedings.
The deal, according to the diary, involved a film script for
me and my son.
It appears the whole affair was engineered by the father to
get vast sums of money out of Jackson for what was likely a
minor indiscretion on the part of Jackson.
Jackson was willing to pay but wanted the money put in trust
for the boy. Also, Jackson was unwilling to go as high as $20
million. The incident, such as it was, did not warrant that.
There was no force, no nudity, no attempt at penetration. The
boy said Michael touched him on the outside of his pants, later
that changed to the inside, which was seen as having more effect,
as noted by PBSs Front Line in a February
15 special on the scandal.
The second motive of the father was to take custody of the boy
away from his wife, who had divorced him and was living with
another man a wealthy man.
The diary confirms the contention by the Jackson camp that the
crux of the matter was the $20 million the father wanted for
the script deal. When Jackson refused, he sent the boy, according
to the diary, to the doctor knowing if the boy said anything
about abuse to the doctor he would be obliged by law to tell
the police. The question is, Did the father tell the boy what
to say in the doctors office?
Hard Copy never brought out the manipulations of
the father and presented the entire matter from the fathers
perspective. They did this with all of the people they had on
their show, including Quindoy, the valet, Blanca Francia, the
maid, as well as others.
Their lack of fairness and objectivity in this matter is unprecedented
and warrants attention and counterbalance in the Black press.
The father is more dangerous to the boy than Michael Jackson
The case was settled out of court, but Jackson got even with
the father by tying up the money in trust for the boy until
he reaches legal age, with a court appointed financial overseer.
The father, who claims he can no longer work as a dentist and
really wants a career as a screenwriter is now violating the
legal agreement for his own motives, no doubt hoping to get
a movie deal, book deal and whatever else he can get via shows
like Hard Copy. He may be angling for a movie-of-the-week
deal, but he is also dragging his son back into the limelight,
after the case has been settled. Why?
Ethnic NewsWatch SoftLine Information, Inc., Stamford, CT
Provided by ProQuest LLC. For permission to reuse this article,
HighBeam Research, a part of The Gale Group, Inc. ©
Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. www.HighBeam
* * * * * *
UPDATE from vindicatemj 4.09.10
Lynette, thank you for this find the article is SENSATIONAL.
It is also great because it is the first-hand information
about those events as it is dated May 21, 1994. This places
the article in the period when the settlement had already been
made but the criminal investigation was still in full swing.
The article needs to be thought over really carefully, but let
me share with you some of my immediate veiws on this
piece (and I am not using the comments section as I need to
post some pictures here):
1. Up till now weve been told (by Victor Gutierrez) that
his book of slanders was based on Jordans diary.
However from this article we are learning that it was Jordans
father who allegedly wrote it. I say allegedly
because with those liars and all this pathological lying you
But if Evan Chandler never remonstrated against
those Hard Copy shows it means that he admitted his authorship?
Did he ever dispute it, I wonder?
QUOTE: Tabloid TV show Hard
Copy continues its leading role in the persecution of
Michael Jackson with a so-called diary written by the father
of the 14-year-old boy who was allegedly sexually abused by
Jackson. The diary tells the fathers version of
the events surrounding the abuse case
2. So if Evan Chandler is the author it means he started writing
the diary before, after or during the settlement
with Michael thus breaking the confidentiality
of the agreement. Knowing what a coward Evan Chandler was
it seems to me unlikely that Evan would speak of his authorship
so openly which does not rule out the possibility of
him being its author though.
3. This makes me think that most probably the copy of the diary
was obtained from Victor Gutierrez who worked as a stable source
of information for the Hard Copy and Diane Dimond and who
was evidently working in close cooperation with Evan
Chandler. He could be a co-author of the diary too.
4. Recalling that Victor Gutierrez had been after Michael even
before the allegations started and prior to the Chandlers
meeting Michael remember the article about VG interviewing
boys well before the Chandler allegations it seems
that Gutierrez comes first in the succession of these
events and Evan comes only second. The initiative
could have been on the Gutierrezs side.
5. Therefore it would be interesting to see all the connections
of this mysterious Victor Gutierrez people he associates
with, media channels he uses, who supports him
6. The point in the article which David didnt like
also attracted my attention, though for a different
QUOTE: It appears the whole affair
was engineered by the father to get vast sums of money out of
Jackson for what was likely a minor indiscretion on the
part of Jackson
. The incident, such as it was, did not
warrant that. There was no force, no nudity, no attempt
at penetration. The boy said Michael touched him on the outside
of his pants, later that changed to the inside, which
was seen as having more effect, as noted by PBSs
Front Line in a February 15 special on the scandal.
So initially there was no nudity? Which means that all
those horror stories about them taking a bath together
and seeing each other naked for the first time in Monaco
are nothing else but simple science fiction?
And initially it was just touching him on the outside
of his pants? Where did we last hear this scenario?
Wasnt it Macauley Culkin who couldnt believe his
ears when Philip Lemarque said that MJs hand was first
on the outside and then reached into the inside
of his pants when the price of his revelation rose
to $500.000? Not to mention the fact that Michael never touched
him at all as Macauley repeatedly said?
So all this 1993 absurdity started with Jordan thinking that
Michael had touched him on the outside of his pants ONLY?
Or was it some tickling as was Jason Francias case?
And that is all there is to it? And this is probably
why it took him a whole hour for Jordan to answer whether
Michael did or did not touch him funnily when his father was
interrogating him after that dental procedure?
7. Another quote of this article is also disclosing some of
the Chandlers most cherished secrets to us:
QUOTE: The second motive of the
father was to take custody of the boy away from his wife, who
had divorced him and was living with another man a wealthy
David Schwartz at 70
Yes, in contrast to Evan Chandler David Schwartz was a millionaire.
As far as I know his business was worth some $40 mln or so.
But have you ever seen him? Look at the picture of this vigorous
but nevertheless 70-year old man and you will realize that June
Chandler married him not out of love, but out of love for a
different substance MONEY.
Evan Chandler was an embittered and hurt former
husband, abandoned and revengeful. Seeing
June being that much success going from a simple
millionaire to the most desired and richest celebrity of
the world was probably really too much for his wounded
pride. Revenge was on his mind. Killing two birds with one stone.
Getting rid of all of them with one blow. Showing them all
8. Yes, he wanted a new career, publicity for himself, lucrative
and successful shows, EvanStory songs or whatever
it was SUCCESS he was seeking:
Evan Chandler before surgery
QUOTE: The father, who claims he
can no longer work as a dentist and really wants a career as
a screenwriter is now violating the legal agreement for his
own motives, no doubt hoping to get a movie deal, book deal
and whatever else he can get via shows like Hard Copy.
He may be angling for a movie-of-the-week deal..
9. And the only person who is really taking care of
Jordans interests in this horrible saga of money and
success pursuit was Michael Jackson who took pains to
give money not to Evan Chandler directly but to the boy
thus thinking of his future:
QUOTE: The case was settled out
of court, but Jackson got even with the father by tying up the
money in trust for the boy until he reaches legal age, with
a court appointed financial overseer.
10. Money was also the reason for further division
between Evan Chandler and his son see another article,
horribly slanderous about Michael but enlightening as to the
relations between the Chandlers:
Jordan bought an apartment in Manhattan, in a building
with a rooftop swimming pool and running track, and a beachfront
mansion in The Hamptons, the summer retreat for millionaire
With his $20 million pay-off fast mushrooming, thanks to some
lucrative investments he bought shares in Mobil, Chevron
and Texaco life ought to have been sweet for a young
bachelor with film-star looks.
Yet he was constantly on the alert for some revenge-seeking
Jackson fanatic and lived the life of a recluse.
His demons returned four years ago, when Jackson finally faced
trial, accused of having sex with another young boy, cancer
victim Gavin Arvizo.
Appearing chastened, Jordans weeping (!) mother gave evidence
for the prosecution, and he was expected to do the same. He
never took the stand, however, and attempted to evade the spotlight
by staying in a Nevada ski chalet, accompanied by a group of
friends, including singer Sonnet Simmons (a Greek-American he
had met at school).
Tracked down there, he was photographed on the slopes, wearing
an apparently carefree smile and chic designer skiwear, and
cruelly branded a coward in some quarters for refusing to testify.
In later years, though, it was Jordans increasingly turbulent
relationship with his father that troubled him most.
According to Diane Dimond, author of Be Careful Who You Love,
an acclaimed book about the Jackson child abuse saga, the relationship
was dogged by rows over money.
Despite his million-dollar settlement from Jackson, Mr Chandler
was not in his sons financial league, and for several
years Jordan subsidised his father with a generous allowance,
Mr Chandler was forced to go cap in hand for more handouts,
and for a proud man, this was unedifying.
He would fly into uncontrollable tempers, blaming his son for
all the trauma that had befallen the family, and the burden
of his painful genetic illness only made him more irascible.
Their final row occurred in the summer of 2005, when Jordan
and he were sharing the apartment where Mr Chandler shot himself.
Filing for a court restraining order against his father, on
the grounds of domestic abuse, Jordan claimed he
had been battered over the head with a 12lb dumb-bell and sprayed
In his testimony, he also accused his father of trying to choke
The frenzied attack took place just two months after Jackson
had been acquitted of assaulting Gavin Arvizo.
Father and son never settled their differences.
Jordan moved to a new apartment, across the Hudson River in
Manhattan, but now spends much of his time back in California,
where, to some acclaim, Sonnet has just released the love song
they penned together.
Until the events of recent days, Jordan had every reason to
feel his life was at last heading in the right direction.
But his father spiralled into a mental and physical decline.
Still deceptively youthful-looking by dint of his many facelifts,
he was in constant agony from his genetic illness and barely
able to walk in his final days.
He also seems to have been friendless, and so totally estranged
from his family that, when I spoke to Raymond Chandler on Wednesday,
he was waiting to hear about the funeral arrangements
unaware that his brother had already been cremated.
Actually, there was no one there, said a member
of staff at the Jersey City funeral home which organised the
We were instructed that no one would want to go. It was
very sad. They still havent decided what to do with the
Precisely why Jordan and the rest of the family did not pay
their last respects will doubtless be the subject of more speculation
in the internet chat-rooms.
Whatever the reason for their absence, the crematorium was a
hauntingly empty place when the curse of Michael Jackson claimed
its latest victim.
Read the rest of the filth (if you want to) here: What
drove the father of Jordy Chandler to put a gun to his head?
You will find photos of various pages of this book out on the
internet. They will include a description of how Brett was not
circumcised and how he had to masturbate differently. If this
book were truly Jordans diary it an admission that he
was aware of the difference between an intact and circumcised
male therfore getting that part of the description wrong could
only mean that he had never seen Michael Jackson naked or masturbating.
The reason for this is that when an intact male masturbates
the foreskin moves back and forth over the glans penis. I cant
pu it any more simply than that. If Jordan had seen it he would
have known it.
Thank you Helena for your generosity
sharing your investigation!