The filthy book by Carl Tom (Tom OCarroll)
MICHAEL JACKSONS DANGEROUS LIAISONS is to
be released soon but is already found on the Internet: Michael
Jackson´s Dangerous Liaisons
The comments on the book from eminent professors
at Amazon.com initially made me relax as to the possible dangers
of its content:
No less than five eminent scholars who have been asked
to review the book have given it their glowing endorsements,
The most engaging, informed, and generous-hearted
book we have on the subject or are likely ever to have. I recommend
this book strongly to anyone who feels our self-righteous egoism
may have gotten in the way of our ability to see what is in
front of our eyes and to act with some measure of justice and
Professor James R Kincaid, University of Southern California
Shows that the only real abuse of children
that occurred was not from Michaels bedroom horseplay,
but parental manipulation of kids for financial gain. As such,
this book gives us a profound cultural critique of received
assumptions about childhood innocence, pedophilic power,
and parental goodwill.
Professor Thomas K Hubbard, University of Texas at Austin
A recommended read. Not just another book about
Wacko Jacko. There wont be anything written
quite like it.Richard Green, founding president, International
Academy of Sex Research
His vivid and insightful commentary is a joy to
read DJ West, Emeritus Professor of Clinical Criminology.
I was terribly misguided by the comments of those professors
thinking it could be some kind of a serious research. Now that
we see for ourselves that the text is based on tabloid trash
only and books like the one by Victor Gutierrez (who even had
to flee the country not to answer for his murderous slander
of Michael Jackson) I want to ask a question.
Where is the responsibility of all those eminent
scholars? If a serial killer writes a book about human behavior
from his extremely valuable point of view will they give their
glowing endorsements to it too? Will anyone be interested
in the twists of the killers perverse mind, unless they
are specialists in criminology or psychiatry of course? Who
in his right mind can consider the observations of a criminal
so precious that they will admire and recommend them to others
as if he were a highly acclaimed authority on the problem of
human relations? WHO IS MAD here the killer or the
society which refers to a criminal mind for guidance on crucial
Is Thomas OCarroll a criminal? Absolutely. He is a self-confessed
pedophile who has been championing the rights of pedophiles
and the legalization of sex between adults and children for
about 40 years and who says about himself in his book Paedophilia:
the Radical Case (1981):
I am a paedophile, and have felt it necessary to crash
through the barriers of societal disapproval by speaking out.
The fact that I have been able to do so owes much to the work
of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a group with which
I have been closely connected, which has been campaigning since
its inception in 1974 for the open discussion of paedophilia,
and for abolition of the laws against consensual sexual acts
between children and adults. Paedophilia
- The radical case
Thomas OCarroll was not only connected with
the PIE but became it chairman in 1977. Its aims included giving
advice and counsel to pedophiles who wanted it. It held regular
meetings in London and also had a Contact Page,
which was a bulletin in which members placed advertisements,
giving their membership number, general location, and brief
details of their sexual and other interests. Replies were handled
by PIE, as with a box number system, so that correspondents
were unidentifiable until they chose to exchange their own details.
The idea behind their activity was to get the highest possible
publicity for themselves. One of its first chairmen, Keith Hose
wrote that The only way for PIE to survive, was to seek
out as much publicity for the organization as possible
We felt that the only way to get more paedophiles joining P
was to seek out and try to get all kinds of publications
to print our organizations name and address and to make
pedophilia a real public issue.
MAKE IT A REAL PUBLIC ISSUE? Is it for championing their pedophilic
cause that they need completely innocent but highly popular
people like Michael Jackson? Those who cannot answer for themselves
too as they are deceased and cannot dissociate themselves from
all this filth?
Since the author evidently focuses on the 1993 case in Michaels
biography let me remind you that the 2005 which found him completely
innocent looked NOT ONLY into the nonsense Arvizo case. Many
forget that Michael Jacksons acquittal in 2005 was covering
ALL the allegations from earlier cases too. The prosecutor did
a really fine job, brought all the evidence from the earlier
times but the court found absolutely nothing to prove the allegations.
And I am not even mentioning the numerous new facts of Michaels
innocence in the 1993 case which have been found lately by really
With the help of Michaels innocent name this Tom OCarroll
guy is evidently hoping to breathe in new life into their pedophilic
cause. The organization has had some setbacks lately. The PIE
organization has long been defunct and in January 2006 the 61-year-old
Thomas Victor OCarroll was arrested for keeping and distributing
child porn. Also detained was Michael Studdert, 67, a former
Anglican minister and school chaplain from Surrey.
During the arrest, a search of Studderts extensive country
home, and some 17 acres of grounds, uncovered two highly sophisticated
hidden compartments. The hides contained a massive
hoard of indecent images of children, believed to be his lifetimes
collection, with images from the 1950's to modern day in a variety
The formats included videos, photographic slides, cine films,
photographs, magazines and photographic negatives. In terms
of formats it was the widest ranging personal collection of
abusive material known to the Metropolitan Police Service ever
attributed to one person.
Thomas OCarroll, who had helped to run the library from
his then home in Shildon, Co Durham, admitted two counts of
distributing child porn images between January 1995 and 2005.
The BBC reported that Children, mainly boys and some as
young as six, had been filmed and photographed being raped and
jailed for child porn library
Michael Studdert was sentenced to four years. Thomas Victor
OCarroll was sentenced to two and a half years imprisonment
and was placed on the Sex Offenders Register for 10 years.
And it is THIS author who is allowed to share his valuable
views on Michael Jackson now and pay tribute to him by his hell-of-a-book
just on the eve of the first year since Michaels death?
Are they commemorating him this way or what?
It is a PEDOPHILIC opus by this author which is being praised
by eminent professors of several universities now? How is it
possible that a convicted pedophile is getting so much attention
now that even the academic community is enthusiastically applauding
Is it THIS that they are applauding?
As a lover of boys, I find myself tending to write more
about relationships between boys and men than other forms of
paedophilic encounters, including the apparently far more numerous
contacts between girls and men
I find it irritating to write about the penis
and the vagina, about masturbation and
sexual intercourse. To use the four-letter equivalents
of these words providing it is not done in an aggressive,
expletive way enables one to de-medicalise sex, to talk
about it in the enthusiastic way that healthy folk think about
it. Such words, though robust and earthy, lie more
easily with the softer, more tender, eroticism
The key element in PIEs proposals on the age of
consent, as we have seen, is the assertion that children should
have some say in what they do with their own bodies. They should
be free to decide, as a matter of right, whether or not they
want a sexual relationship
By the way the author of Paedophilia book received
enormous help from certain scholars back in 1981 too:
It remains for me to extend my heartfelt thanks to all
those who have helped me, especially Dr Kenneth Plummer,
Lecturer in Sociology at Essex University, Ms Nettie Pollard
of the National Council for Civil Liberties (now Liberty), and
D. J. West, Professor of Clinical Criminology at Cambridge
University, each of whom read the whole text in draft and made
many valuable suggestions
(Incidentally Dr.West is the same scholar who
is now praising new OCarrolls book about Michael
Dr David Nias and Dr Glenn Wilson, both
of the Institute of Psychiatry, London, proved to be my most
ego-boosting consultants. Close on their heels, in this respect,
was Mr David Watson, formerly Lecturer in Moral Philosophy
at Glasgow University. Many others read, and commented upon,
Why are these and other scholars making positive
comments on the views of a proven and self-confessed pedophile
and are recommending us his new book?
Isnt this pedophile supposed to stay silent, non-active
and quiet as he is still on the Sex Offenders Register and will
be there for some 8 years or so?
Why is Amazon.com offering this book for sale?
HAVE ALL OF THEM GONE MAD?
OR ARE ALL THESE EXCEPTIONS OKAY WHEN IT COMES TO THE MEMORY
OF MICHAEL JACKSON?
Thank you Helena for your generosity
sharing your investigation!