Okay, guys so after the 15 years of bullying
Michael Jackson and trashing his name in every possible way
the devious onslaught against him has now entered a new stage
that of gentle lies masquerading as the truth and soothing
reassurances meant to convince the general public of the authors
unbiased attitude and very best intentions.
What am I talking about? I am talking about the 624-page book
by a Carl Toms to come out soon which is being advertised as
an all-inclusive research into Michaels real
relationship with boys.
This new scientific and seemingly objective approach
may turn out very effective for Michaels haters and their
audience. The general public is really fed up with all those
blatant lies about Jackson and thinks that some justice should
be done to the man at last so it is time for all the
negativity to be fed into the peoples minds in a soft
and unbiased way without them ever noticing
that they are swallowing the same old LIE.
How do they do that? Nothing can be easier just look
at the editorial review from Amazon.com announcing the book
to be released on June 7, 2010 (scheduled to mark the 1st anniversary
of Michael Jacksons death this way?). See how well in
advance the preparation works starts and how gracefully the
same old lies are being worded now here is the review
sentence by sentence with the implications to be swallowed (given
in the brackets):
Not just another book about Wacko Jacko
(so much respect for Michael Jackson!)
This vivid and insightful commentary is a joy to read
(isnt it enjoyable to slander the deceased man in a witty
and hilarious way?)
A must-read for those who believe he truly loved children
but are not so sure about his innocence
happens to your beliefs after you read it
Michael Jackson spent the wedding night of his second
marriage not with his bride but with his best man an eight-year-old
boy. (hideous to say the least
In fact the wedding took place on November 15, 1996 just several
hours before Michaels departure for his tour in Australia.
He left the US after the plain civil wedding ceremony at a presidential
suite of the Sheraton hotel. Debbie Rowe was 6 months pregnant
at the time. Just compare this news with the wedding night
with a boy and you might see a little difference between
the two ways of presenting facts.
His first marriage ended in divorce after he had
been on holiday with two young boys without his wife.
(So the marriage ended as soon as Lisa-Maria Presley learned
of his relationship with boys!!!).
The actual events preceding the divorce were as follows:
December 6, 1995: Michael collapsed while rehearsing
the concert and was rushed to the Beth Israel Medical Center
. He was found suffering from gastro-enteritis, dehydration
and electrolyte imbalances. JRandy Toraborelli: As soon as he
was checked into the hospital, Michaels press people telephoned
Lisa in Los Angeles and, with frantic explanations, begged her
to fly to her husbands side. Hell, no was
her response. Screw him. Im not going. Why should
I? December 10, 1995: Lisa Marie finally visited him and
asked for a divorce. Officially the divorce was filed on January
Here is Lisa-Marias own version of the same: He
was in the hospital, and I couldnt figure out what was
wrong with him. I started asking questions, and it was always
a different story. He said I was causing trouble
and stirring up problems. He told me, youre
making my heart rate go up, and asked me to go home, and
I said, Good. I want out.
As regards the boys issue Lisa-Maria told PLAYBOY
in June 2003 that she had never seen any inappropriate behavior
on Michaels part:
- Did you and he ever have children join you in your bed?
- Never. Never, never, never, never. I never saw him sleep in
bed with a child, ever.
- Did you ever see him with photos of nude children?
- Never. Never.
- Do you have any reason to think hes a child molester?
- If Id had any reason to suspect that, I would have had
nothing to do with the guy. Ive never seen him behave
inappropriately. He was great with my kids. He does have a connection
with kids, babies. Hes a kid, and other kids sense that
But we have to go on:
To kneejerk loyalists, the King of Pops love
of children was innocent: end of story. For the more reflective
among us, whether we are intrigued, baffled, appalled, empathic,
or even all these things, Michael Jacksons Dangerous Liaisons
provides the definitive review of his numerous special friendships
(Kneejerk MJ fans are the zombies not worth talking about, while
you and I are really intelligent people, so swallow what we
are telling you without thinking twice as our review is completely
Defaming Michael Jacksons supporters as kneejerk loyalists?
Boosting the confidence and self-esteem of Michaels haters
by saying that they are the only ones who are capable of thinking?
A truly divide-and-rule principle targeted at each segment of
the public in a very sophisticated way
Armed with insights from a range of disciplines
psychology, sociology, moral philosophy Carl Toms spent many
years researching the megastars boy-love (what
a thorough all-inclusive scientific and moral study it is!).
You bet it is.
He delves deeply into the sources of Michaels
enigmatic identity, soul and genius while keeping a sceptical
eye on the assumptions and values of the Kings detractors.
(see how objective our study is we go as far as calling
Michael genius and are even sceptical about his detractors!).
A half-truth here and a half-lie there do not amount to the
Toms is the only book to examine thoroughly
Michaels trial on child abuse charges without losing sight
of the increasingly well documented but surprisingly little
known or understood facts about earlier allegations. (weve
lulled your attention well enough to allege that the 2005 trial
overlooked all those documents
The real truth about the matter is that the man who was Michael
Jacksons life-long prosecutor fortunately proved himself
his dedicated hater too therefore we cannot suspect Tom
Sneddon of leaving any stone unturned or any speck of dust under
Michaels shoes non-examined with a magnifying glass. This
alone makes the above statement a complete LIE all the
evidence from earlier cases was brought into the 2005 trial
thanks to Tom Sneddons efforts and scrutinized there as
if under a microscope. And this means that the non-guilty verdict
of the year 2005 automatically acquits Michael Jackson of all
earlier accusations as well.
It exposes the falsity of persistent efforts to
whitewash the record by inventing for Michael a phoney normal,
or plain vanilla gay, sexuality.
No, it is your phoney editorial review exposes the never-ending
desire of some people to smear the man who by all human laws
of decency and ethics should be left alone at last
The author probes Michaels intense identification
with Peter Pan, the eternal boy, acknowledging the profound
significance of this attachment but discarding the welter of
dated Freudian psychobabble it has spawned. (Look at the
quintessence of our objectivity!).
It is good youre discarding the Freudian sex-based-only-theory
as it would be complete nonsense to apply it to Michael Jacksons
beautiful inner world and deep spirituality, but I suggest you
research the eternal boy phenomenon in a much wider
context including similar examples from other authors and musicians
like, for example, the beautiful Forever young
hit (just my opinion).
Refusing to settle for the easy cliches about Michaels
lost childhood, Toms examines groundbreaking research
into intimate man-boy contacts in order to illuminate the real
nature of Michaels dangerous liaisons and the surprising
challenge they present to our moral certainties.
So this is the root of the matter? You are defending your moral
certainties? And who said you had them?
P.S. Now that I am told this Carl Toms is a convicted pedophile
I am ashamed that I ever gave him the benefit of the doubt.
This post has been returned now to its original variant.
Thank you Helena for your generosity
sharing your investigation!